4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 35d0ac9070ef619e3bf44324375878a1c540387b ]
If the element exists and no NLM_F_EXCL is specified, do not bump
set->nelems, otherwise we leak one set element slot. This problem
amplifies if the set is full since the abort path always decrements the
counter for the -ENFILE case too, giving one spare extra slot.
Fix this by moving set->nelems update to nft_add_set_elem() after
successful element insertion. Moreover, remove the element if the set is
full so there is no need to rely on the abort path to undo things
anymore.
Fixes: c016c7e45ddf ("netfilter: nf_tables: honor NLM_F_EXCL flag in set element insertion")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -3637,10 +3637,18 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_c
goto err5;
}
+ if (set->size &&
+ !atomic_add_unless(&set->nelems, 1, set->size + set->ndeact)) {
+ err = -ENFILE;
+ goto err6;
+ }
+
nft_trans_elem(trans) = elem;
list_add_tail(&trans->list, &ctx->net->nft.commit_list);
return 0;
+err6:
+ set->ops->remove(set, &elem);
err5:
kfree(trans);
err4:
@@ -3687,15 +3695,9 @@ static int nf_tables_newsetelem(struct n
return -EBUSY;
nla_for_each_nested(attr, nla[NFTA_SET_ELEM_LIST_ELEMENTS], rem) {
- if (set->size &&
- !atomic_add_unless(&set->nelems, 1, set->size + set->ndeact))
- return -ENFILE;
-
err = nft_add_set_elem(&ctx, set, attr, nlh->nlmsg_flags);
- if (err < 0) {
- atomic_dec(&set->nelems);
+ if (err < 0)
break;
- }
}
return err;
}