4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit cc1582c231ea041fbc68861dfaf957eaf902b829 upstream.
When doing sampling, for example:
perf record -e cycles:u ...
On workloads that do a lot of kernel entry/exits we see kernel
samples, even though :u is specified. This is due to skid existing.
This might be a security issue because it can leak kernel addresses even
though kernel sampling support is disabled.
The patch drops the kernel samples if exclude_kernel is specified.
For example, test on Haswell desktop:
perf record -e cycles:u <mgen>
perf report --stdio
Before patch applied:
99.77% mgen mgen [.] buf_read
0.20% mgen mgen [.] rand_buf_init
0.01% mgen [kernel.vmlinux] [k] apic_timer_interrupt
0.00% mgen mgen [.] last_free_elem
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] __random_r
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] _int_malloc
0.00% mgen mgen [.] rand_array_init
0.00% mgen [kernel.vmlinux] [k] page_fault
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] __random
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] __strcasestr
0.00% mgen ld-2.23.so [.] strcmp
0.00% mgen ld-2.23.so [.] _dl_start
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] sched_setaffinity@@GLIBC_2.3.4
0.00% mgen ld-2.23.so [.] _start
We can see kernel symbols apic_timer_interrupt and page_fault.
After patch applied:
99.79% mgen mgen [.] buf_read
0.19% mgen mgen [.] rand_buf_init
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] __random_r
0.00% mgen mgen [.] rand_array_init
0.00% mgen mgen [.] last_free_elem
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] vfprintf
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] rand
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] __random
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] _int_malloc
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] _IO_doallocbuf
0.00% mgen ld-2.23.so [.] do_lookup_x
0.00% mgen ld-2.23.so [.] open_verify.constprop.7
0.00% mgen ld-2.23.so [.] _dl_important_hwcaps
0.00% mgen libc-2.23.so [.] sched_setaffinity@@GLIBC_2.3.4
0.00% mgen ld-2.23.so [.] _start
There are only userspace symbols.
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: acme@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx
Cc: will.deacon@xxxxxxx
Cc: yao.jin@xxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1495706947-3744-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7184,6 +7184,21 @@ int perf_event_account_interrupt(struct
return __perf_event_account_interrupt(event, 1);
}
+static bool sample_is_allowed(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /*
+ * Due to interrupt latency (AKA "skid"), we may enter the
+ * kernel before taking an overflow, even if the PMU is only
+ * counting user events.
+ * To avoid leaking information to userspace, we must always
+ * reject kernel samples when exclude_kernel is set.
+ */
+ if (event->attr.exclude_kernel && !user_mode(regs))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* Generic event overflow handling, sampling.
*/
@@ -7205,6 +7220,12 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct
ret = __perf_event_account_interrupt(event, throttle);
/*
+ * For security, drop the skid kernel samples if necessary.
+ */
+ if (!sample_is_allowed(event, regs))
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
* XXX event_limit might not quite work as expected on inherited
* events
*/