3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 96f97a83910cdb9d89d127c5ee523f8fc040a804 upstream. If a port gets unplugged while a user is blocked on read(), -ENODEV is returned. However, subsequent read()s returned 0, indicating there's no host-side connection (but not indicating the device went away). This also happened when a port was unplugged and the user didn't have any blocking operation pending. If the user didn't monitor the SIGIO signal, they won't have a chance to find out if the port went away. Fix by returning -ENODEV on all read()s after the port gets unplugged. write() already behaves this way. Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -625,6 +625,10 @@ static ssize_t port_fops_read(struct fil port = filp->private_data; + /* Port is hot-unplugged. */ + if (!port->guest_connected) + return -ENODEV; + if (!port_has_data(port)) { /* * If nothing's connected on the host just return 0 in @@ -641,7 +645,7 @@ static ssize_t port_fops_read(struct fil if (ret < 0) return ret; } - /* Port got hot-unplugged. */ + /* Port got hot-unplugged while we were waiting above. */ if (!port->guest_connected) return -ENODEV; /* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html