Le 02/06/2017 à 11:35, Vaibhav Jain a écrit :
During an eeh call to cxl_remove can result in double free_irq of
psl,slice interrupts. This can happen if perst_reloads_same_image == 1
and call to cxl_configure_adapter() fails during slot_reset
callback. In such a case we see a kernel oops with following back-trace:
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
Call Trace:
free_irq+0x88/0xd0 (unreliable)
cxl_unmap_irq+0x20/0x40 [cxl]
cxl_native_release_psl_irq+0x78/0xd8 [cxl]
pci_deconfigure_afu+0xac/0x110 [cxl]
cxl_remove+0x104/0x210 [cxl]
pci_device_remove+0x6c/0x110
device_release_driver_internal+0x204/0x2e0
pci_stop_bus_device+0xa0/0xd0
pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x28/0x40
pci_hp_remove_devices+0xb0/0x150
pci_hp_remove_devices+0x68/0x150
eeh_handle_normal_event+0x140/0x580
eeh_handle_event+0x174/0x360
eeh_event_handler+0x1e8/0x1f0
This patch fixes the issue of double free_irq by checking that
variables that hold the virqs (err_hwirq, serr_hwirq, psl_virq) are
not '0' before un-mapping and resetting these variables to '0' when
they are un-mapped.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Re-send:
- Added stable to recipients
---
drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
index 871a2f0..3ed2254 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
@@ -1302,13 +1302,16 @@ int cxl_native_register_psl_err_irq(struct cxl *adapter)
void cxl_native_release_psl_err_irq(struct cxl *adapter)
{
- if (adapter->native->err_virq != irq_find_mapping(NULL, adapter->native->err_hwirq))
+ if (adapter->native->err_virq == 0 ||
+ adapter->native->err_virq !=
+ irq_find_mapping(NULL, adapter->native->err_hwirq))
return;
cxl_p1_write(adapter, CXL_PSL_ErrIVTE, 0x0000000000000000);
cxl_unmap_irq(adapter->native->err_virq, adapter);
cxl_ops->release_one_irq(adapter, adapter->native->err_hwirq);
kfree(adapter->irq_name);
+ adapter->native->err_virq = 0;
}
int cxl_native_register_serr_irq(struct cxl_afu *afu)
@@ -1346,13 +1349,15 @@ int cxl_native_register_serr_irq(struct cxl_afu *afu)
void cxl_native_release_serr_irq(struct cxl_afu *afu)
{
- if (afu->serr_virq != irq_find_mapping(NULL, afu->serr_hwirq))
+ if (afu->serr_virq == 0 ||
+ afu->serr_virq != irq_find_mapping(NULL, afu->serr_hwirq))
return;
cxl_p1n_write(afu, CXL_PSL_SERR_An, 0x0000000000000000);
cxl_unmap_irq(afu->serr_virq, afu);
cxl_ops->release_one_irq(afu->adapter, afu->serr_hwirq);
kfree(afu->err_irq_name);
+ afu->serr_virq = 0;
}
int cxl_native_register_psl_irq(struct cxl_afu *afu)
@@ -1375,12 +1380,15 @@ int cxl_native_register_psl_irq(struct cxl_afu *afu)
void cxl_native_release_psl_irq(struct cxl_afu *afu)
{
- if (afu->native->psl_virq != irq_find_mapping(NULL, afu->native->psl_hwirq))
+ if (afu->native->psl_virq == 0 ||
+ afu->native->psl_virq !=
+ irq_find_mapping(NULL, afu->native->psl_virq))
^^^
Shouldn't it be psl_hwirq?
Fred
return;
cxl_unmap_irq(afu->native->psl_virq, afu);
cxl_ops->release_one_irq(afu->adapter, afu->native->psl_hwirq);
kfree(afu->psl_irq_name);
+ afu->native->psl_virq = 0;
}
static void recover_psl_err(struct cxl_afu *afu, u64 errstat)