3.16.44-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit af2e859edd477fa1ea3d1d106f41a595cff3d162 upstream.
=46romconflicting macro parameters, passing the wrong name to
__MUTEX_INITIALIZER and a stray '\', #define __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER was
very unhappy.
One unnecessary change was to choose to pass &ww_class instead of
implicitly taking the address of the class within the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 1b375dc30710 ("mutex: Move ww_mutex definitions to ww_mutex.h")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-2-chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ struct ww_mutex {
};
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, ww_class) \
- , .ww_class = &ww_class
+# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \
+ , .ww_class = class
#else
-# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, ww_class)
+# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class)
#endif
#define __WW_CLASS_INITIALIZER(ww_class) \
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct ww_mutex {
, .mutex_name = #ww_class "_mutex" }
#define __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \
- { .base = { \__MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) } \
+ { .base = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname.base) \
__WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) }
#define DEFINE_WW_CLASS(classname) \