* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, this does not answer my question: between latest tip:timers/nohz and the > > patches you posted there's a delta, so it's not just a pure rebase. > > Yeah but like I said, you can forget the series I posted because the diff is > mostly cosmetic and things are actually ok as they are in tip:timers/nohz > > The only thing that bothers me is the fact that the HEAD of this branch doesn't have > a changelog or even just a comment. We can still amend that - is this changelog what you had in mind: nohz: Reset next_tick cache even when the timer has no regs Handle tick interrupts whose regs are NULL, out of general paranoia. It happens when hrtimer_interrupt() is called from non-interrupt contexts, such as hotplug CPU down events. ? Or you can send me a longer version as well. Thanks, Ingo