On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 03:13:41PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > NAK to this and all other backports of 51f567777799 (but I'll try to NAK > them all individually). > > I also tentatively have a stable cc on the upstream revert that I've got > queued up--I figured that might be good just in case any backports slip > through. (But if getting the cc on a revert that probably doesn't apply > is more annoying, tell me.) > > Apologies for this one, the problem was fixed by e6838a29ecb "nfsd: > check for oversized NFSv2/v3 arguments", but I accidentally left this > earlier attempt at a fix on the branch that I submitted for 4.12. Thanks for letting me know, I've now dropped this from all of the stable queues. greg k-h