Patch "cpufreq: rename ignore_nice as ignore_nice_load" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    cpufreq: rename ignore_nice as ignore_nice_load

to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     cpufreq-rename-ignore_nice-as-ignore_nice_load.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 6c4640c3adfd97ce10efed7c07405f52d002b9a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:28:02 +0530
Subject: cpufreq: rename ignore_nice as ignore_nice_load

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 6c4640c3adfd97ce10efed7c07405f52d002b9a8 upstream.

This sysfs file was called ignore_nice_load earlier and commit
4d5dcc4 (cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of
governors) changed its name to ignore_nice by mistake.

Lets get it renamed back to its original name.

Reported-by: Martin von Gagern <Martin.vGagern@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c |   20 ++++++++++----------
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c     |    8 ++++----
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h     |    4 ++--
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     |   20 ++++++++++----------
 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static ssize_t store_down_threshold(stru
 	return count;
 }
 
-static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, const char *buf,
-		size_t count)
+static ssize_t store_ignore_nice_load(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
+		const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
 	struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
 	unsigned int input, j;
@@ -235,10 +235,10 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct
 	if (input > 1)
 		input = 1;
 
-	if (input == cs_tuners->ignore_nice) /* nothing to do */
+	if (input == cs_tuners->ignore_nice_load) /* nothing to do */
 		return count;
 
-	cs_tuners->ignore_nice = input;
+	cs_tuners->ignore_nice_load = input;
 
 	/* we need to re-evaluate prev_cpu_idle */
 	for_each_online_cpu(j) {
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct
 		dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, j);
 		dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j,
 					&dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_wall, 0);
-		if (cs_tuners->ignore_nice)
+		if (cs_tuners->ignore_nice_load)
 			dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_nice =
 				kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
 	}
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ show_store_one(cs, sampling_rate);
 show_store_one(cs, sampling_down_factor);
 show_store_one(cs, up_threshold);
 show_store_one(cs, down_threshold);
-show_store_one(cs, ignore_nice);
+show_store_one(cs, ignore_nice_load);
 show_store_one(cs, freq_step);
 declare_show_sampling_rate_min(cs);
 
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(sampling_rate);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(sampling_down_factor);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(up_threshold);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(down_threshold);
-gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(ignore_nice);
+gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(ignore_nice_load);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(freq_step);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_ro(sampling_rate_min);
 
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static struct attribute *dbs_attributes_
 	&sampling_down_factor_gov_sys.attr,
 	&up_threshold_gov_sys.attr,
 	&down_threshold_gov_sys.attr,
-	&ignore_nice_gov_sys.attr,
+	&ignore_nice_load_gov_sys.attr,
 	&freq_step_gov_sys.attr,
 	NULL
 };
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static struct attribute *dbs_attributes_
 	&sampling_down_factor_gov_pol.attr,
 	&up_threshold_gov_pol.attr,
 	&down_threshold_gov_pol.attr,
-	&ignore_nice_gov_pol.attr,
+	&ignore_nice_load_gov_pol.attr,
 	&freq_step_gov_pol.attr,
 	NULL
 };
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int cs_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_
 	tuners->up_threshold = DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD;
 	tuners->down_threshold = DEF_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD;
 	tuners->sampling_down_factor = DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR;
-	tuners->ignore_nice = 0;
+	tuners->ignore_nice_load = 0;
 	tuners->freq_step = DEF_FREQUENCY_STEP;
 
 	dbs_data->tuners = tuners;
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -91,9 +91,9 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_
 	unsigned int j;
 
 	if (dbs_data->cdata->governor == GOV_ONDEMAND)
-		ignore_nice = od_tuners->ignore_nice;
+		ignore_nice = od_tuners->ignore_nice_load;
 	else
-		ignore_nice = cs_tuners->ignore_nice;
+		ignore_nice = cs_tuners->ignore_nice_load;
 
 	policy = cdbs->cur_policy;
 
@@ -336,12 +336,12 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_
 		cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
 		cs_dbs_info = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
 		sampling_rate = cs_tuners->sampling_rate;
-		ignore_nice = cs_tuners->ignore_nice;
+		ignore_nice = cs_tuners->ignore_nice_load;
 	} else {
 		od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
 		od_dbs_info = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
 		sampling_rate = od_tuners->sampling_rate;
-		ignore_nice = od_tuners->ignore_nice;
+		ignore_nice = od_tuners->ignore_nice_load;
 		od_ops = dbs_data->cdata->gov_ops;
 		io_busy = od_tuners->io_is_busy;
 	}
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s {
 
 /* Per policy Governers sysfs tunables */
 struct od_dbs_tuners {
-	unsigned int ignore_nice;
+	unsigned int ignore_nice_load;
 	unsigned int sampling_rate;
 	unsigned int sampling_down_factor;
 	unsigned int up_threshold;
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct od_dbs_tuners {
 };
 
 struct cs_dbs_tuners {
-	unsigned int ignore_nice;
+	unsigned int ignore_nice_load;
 	unsigned int sampling_rate;
 	unsigned int sampling_down_factor;
 	unsigned int up_threshold;
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -403,8 +403,8 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_down_facto
 	return count;
 }
 
-static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, const char *buf,
-		size_t count)
+static ssize_t store_ignore_nice_load(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
+		const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
 	struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
 	unsigned int input;
@@ -419,10 +419,10 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct
 	if (input > 1)
 		input = 1;
 
-	if (input == od_tuners->ignore_nice) { /* nothing to do */
+	if (input == od_tuners->ignore_nice_load) { /* nothing to do */
 		return count;
 	}
-	od_tuners->ignore_nice = input;
+	od_tuners->ignore_nice_load = input;
 
 	/* we need to re-evaluate prev_cpu_idle */
 	for_each_online_cpu(j) {
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct
 		dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, j);
 		dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j,
 			&dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_wall, od_tuners->io_is_busy);
-		if (od_tuners->ignore_nice)
+		if (od_tuners->ignore_nice_load)
 			dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_nice =
 				kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
 
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ show_store_one(od, sampling_rate);
 show_store_one(od, io_is_busy);
 show_store_one(od, up_threshold);
 show_store_one(od, sampling_down_factor);
-show_store_one(od, ignore_nice);
+show_store_one(od, ignore_nice_load);
 show_store_one(od, powersave_bias);
 declare_show_sampling_rate_min(od);
 
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(sampling_rate);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(io_is_busy);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(up_threshold);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(sampling_down_factor);
-gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(ignore_nice);
+gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(ignore_nice_load);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(powersave_bias);
 gov_sys_pol_attr_ro(sampling_rate_min);
 
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static struct attribute *dbs_attributes_
 	&sampling_rate_gov_sys.attr,
 	&up_threshold_gov_sys.attr,
 	&sampling_down_factor_gov_sys.attr,
-	&ignore_nice_gov_sys.attr,
+	&ignore_nice_load_gov_sys.attr,
 	&powersave_bias_gov_sys.attr,
 	&io_is_busy_gov_sys.attr,
 	NULL
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static struct attribute *dbs_attributes_
 	&sampling_rate_gov_pol.attr,
 	&up_threshold_gov_pol.attr,
 	&sampling_down_factor_gov_pol.attr,
-	&ignore_nice_gov_pol.attr,
+	&ignore_nice_load_gov_pol.attr,
 	&powersave_bias_gov_pol.attr,
 	&io_is_busy_gov_pol.attr,
 	NULL
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_
 	}
 
 	tuners->sampling_down_factor = DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR;
-	tuners->ignore_nice = 0;
+	tuners->ignore_nice_load = 0;
 	tuners->powersave_bias = default_powersave_bias;
 	tuners->io_is_busy = should_io_be_busy();
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-3.10/cpufreq-rename-ignore_nice-as-ignore_nice_load.patch
queue-3.10/cpufreq-loongson2-fix-regression-related-to-clock-management.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]