This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
dm bufio: check new buffer allocation watermark every 30 seconds
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
dm-bufio-check-new-buffer-allocation-watermark-every-30-seconds.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 390020ad2af9ca04844c4f3b1f299ad8746d84c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:34:53 -0400
Subject: dm bufio: check new buffer allocation watermark every 30 seconds
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 390020ad2af9ca04844c4f3b1f299ad8746d84c8 upstream.
dm-bufio checks a watermark when it allocates a new buffer in
__bufio_new(). However, it doesn't check the watermark when the user
changes /sys/module/dm_bufio/parameters/max_cache_size_bytes.
This may result in a problem - if the watermark is high enough so that
all possible buffers are allocated and if the user lowers the value of
"max_cache_size_bytes", the watermark will never be checked against the
new value because no new buffer would be allocated.
To fix this, change __evict_old_buffers() so that it checks the
watermark. __evict_old_buffers() is called every 30 seconds, so if the
user reduces "max_cache_size_bytes", dm-bufio will react to this change
within 30 seconds and decrease memory consumption.
Depends-on: 1b0fb5a5b2 ("dm bufio: avoid a possible ABBA deadlock")
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -1782,9 +1782,17 @@ static void __evict_old_buffers(struct d
struct dm_buffer *b, *tmp;
unsigned retain_target = get_retain_buffers(c);
unsigned count;
+ LIST_HEAD(write_list);
dm_bufio_lock(c);
+ __check_watermark(c, &write_list);
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&write_list))) {
+ dm_bufio_unlock(c);
+ __flush_write_list(&write_list);
+ dm_bufio_lock(c);
+ }
+
count = c->n_buffers[LIST_CLEAN] + c->n_buffers[LIST_DIRTY];
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(b, tmp, &c->lru[LIST_CLEAN], lru_list) {
if (count <= retain_target)
@@ -1809,6 +1817,8 @@ static void cleanup_old_buffers(void)
mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
+ __cache_size_refresh();
+
list_for_each_entry(c, &dm_bufio_all_clients, client_list)
__evict_old_buffers(c, max_age_hz);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.9/dm-bufio-avoid-a-possible-abba-deadlock.patch
queue-4.9/dm-cache-metadata-fail-operations-if-fail_io-mode-has-been-established.patch
queue-4.9/dm-raid-select-the-kconfig-option-config_md_raid0.patch
queue-4.9/dm-bufio-make-the-parameter-retain_bytes-unsigned-long.patch
queue-4.9/dm-bufio-check-new-buffer-allocation-watermark-every-30-seconds.patch