On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 18:30 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:29:23PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > > > > I can't push back on people with silly coding style and small > > semantic > > issues forever. And I think I made a serious effort to keep the > > patches getting posted over and over again to make sure they got > > more > > exposure. > > You can tell them to go to linux-rdma. I'm sending people to the > right > mailing list all the time. Indeed. Every single time a patch comes into linux-rdma that touches things in net/ or include/net, unless it is exceedingly minor, I check the To:/Cc: lines on the email and if netdev@ isn't included, or in the case of complex/tricky items, you aren't directly Cc:ed, then I specifically tell them to include netdev@ and/or you. I've even had things like a 12 patch series that buried three netdev@ appropriate patches at different points in the series and told the submitter to move all of the netdev@ related patches to the front and submit them to netdev@ so they can be reviewed as a group before I would move on to the others. It's just what you do. I've always considered that part of my job. -- Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD