On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:48 PM, kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > stable/linux-4.10.y build: 203 builds: 3 failed, 200 passed, 3 errors, 5 warnings (v4.10.16) > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable/branch/linux-4.10.y/kernel/v4.10.16/ > Tree: stable > Branch: linux-4.10.y > Git Describe: v4.10.16 > Git Commit: 6e8e9958691907e8d7eb3b2107619dddbdaeb175 > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git > Built: 4 unique architectures > > Build Failures Detected: > > arm: gcc version 5.3.1 20160412 (Linaro GCC 5.3-2016.05) > spear3xx_defconfig FAIL > spear6xx_defconfig FAIL > tct_hammer_defconfig FAIL > Errors summary: > 3 net/core/skbuff.c:1575:37: error: 'sock_edemux' undeclared (first use in this function) > Warnings summary: This is a regression against v4.10.15, caused by the backport of c21b48cc1bbf ("net: adjust skb->truesize in ___pskb_trim()") by Eric Dumazet. Part of another commit that Eric did earlier fixes it: 158f323b9868 ("net: adjust skb->truesize in pskb_expand_head()") --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ void sock_efree(struct sk_buff *skb); #ifdef CONFIG_INET void sock_edemux(struct sk_buff *skb); #else -#define sock_edemux(skb) sock_efree(skb) +#define sock_edemux sock_efree #endif int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op, This commit is not marked 'Cc: stable' upstream, but is referenced in the one that was backported and looks like it might be appropriate for stable as well. Eric, can you clarify? Arnd