3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 35f0399db6658f465b00893bdd13b992a0acfef0 upstream.
Several users reported this crash of NULL pointer or general protection,
the story is that we add a rbtree for speedup ulist iteration, and we
use krealloc() to address ulist growth, and krealloc() use memcpy to copy
old data to new memory area, so it's OK for an array as it doesn't use
pointers while it's not OK for a rbtree as it uses pointers.
So krealloc() will mess up our rbtree and it ends up with crash.
Reviewed-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: BJ Quinn <bj@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/ulist.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/ulist.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ulist.c
@@ -205,6 +205,10 @@ int ulist_add_merge(struct ulist *ulist,
u64 new_alloced = ulist->nodes_alloced + 128;
struct ulist_node *new_nodes;
void *old = NULL;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ulist->nnodes; i++)
+ rb_erase(&ulist->nodes[i].rb_node, &ulist->root);
/*
* if nodes_alloced == ULIST_SIZE no memory has been allocated
@@ -224,6 +228,17 @@ int ulist_add_merge(struct ulist *ulist,
ulist->nodes = new_nodes;
ulist->nodes_alloced = new_alloced;
+
+ /*
+ * krealloc actually uses memcpy, which does not copy rb_node
+ * pointers, so we have to do it ourselves. Otherwise we may
+ * be bitten by crashes.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ulist->nnodes; i++) {
+ ret = ulist_rbtree_insert(ulist, &ulist->nodes[i]);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
}
ulist->nodes[ulist->nnodes].val = val;
ulist->nodes[ulist->nnodes].aux = aux;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html