3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx> commit 016d5baad04269e8559332df05f89bd95b52d6ad upstream. The _BIX method returns extended battery info as a package. According the ACPI spec (ACPI 5, Section 10.2.2.2), the first member of that package should be "Revision". However, the current ACPI battery driver treats the first member as "Power Unit" which should be the second member. This causes the result of _BIX return data parsing to be incorrect. Fix this by adding a new member called 'revision' to struct acpi_battery and adding the offsetof() information on it to extended_info_offsets[] as the first row. [rjw: Changelog] Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Hoffmann <jan.christian.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx> References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60519 Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct acpi_battery { struct acpi_device *device; struct notifier_block pm_nb; unsigned long update_time; + int revision; int rate_now; int capacity_now; int voltage_now; @@ -350,6 +351,7 @@ static struct acpi_offsets info_offsets[ }; static struct acpi_offsets extended_info_offsets[] = { + {offsetof(struct acpi_battery, revision), 0}, {offsetof(struct acpi_battery, power_unit), 0}, {offsetof(struct acpi_battery, design_capacity), 0}, {offsetof(struct acpi_battery, full_charge_capacity), 0}, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html