From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Commit e16343c47e4276f5ebc77ca16feb5e50ca1918f9 upstream. The warning was introduced in 2009 (commit 4bf1fa5a34aa ([ARM] 5613/1: implement CALLER_ADDRESSx)). The only "problem" here is that CALLER_ADDRESSx for x > 1 returns NULL which doesn't do much harm. The drawback of implementing a fix (i.e. use unwind tables to implement CALLER_ADDRESSx) is that much of the unwinder code would need to be marked as not traceable. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c index fafedd86885d..827d946d2be4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c @@ -59,10 +59,6 @@ void *return_address(unsigned int level) #else /* if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) */ -#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) -#warning "TODO: return_address should use unwind tables" -#endif - void *return_address(unsigned int level) { return NULL; -- 2.9.0