3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit f84bd6267d623b49f196d54ba9edc41ff1c4d5e3 upstream.
Properly handle the return value from queue_delayed_work() - it's a
bool, not an int, so using a less than comparison isn't appropriate.
This mistake was found by David Binderman <dcb314@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[arnd: the fix is from 4.4 but needed some minor fixup to adapt
to context changes]
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ BOOL visor_periodic_work_nextperiod(stru
pw->want_to_stop = FALSE;
rc = TRUE; /* yes, TRUE; see visor_periodic_work_stop() */
goto unlock;
- } else if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
- pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) {
+ } else if (!queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
+ pw->jiffy_interval)) {
ERRDEV(pw->devnam, "queue_delayed_work failed!");
pw->is_scheduled = FALSE;
rc = FALSE;
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ BOOL visor_periodic_work_start(struct pe
goto unlock;
}
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&pw->work, &periodic_work_func);
- if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
- pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) {
+ if (!queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
+ pw->jiffy_interval)) {
ERRDEV(pw->devnam, "%s queue_delayed_work failed!", __func__);
rc = FALSE;
goto unlock;