Commit f3e2d56dce47dbd0bb3f69f84741b439542fef37 upstream.
Building an arm allmodconfig kernel triggers a lengthy but harmless
warning in the isicom driver:
drvers/tty/isicom.c: In function 'isicom_send_break':
uapi/linux/swab.h:13:15: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow]
(((__u16)(x) & (__u16)0x00ffU) << 8) | \
^
uapi/linux/swab.h:107:2: note: in expansion of macro '___constant_swab16'
___constant_swab16(x) : \
^
uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:43: note: in expansion of macro '__swab16'
#define __cpu_to_le16(x) ((__force __le16)__swab16((x)))
^
linux/byteorder/generic.h:89:21: note: in expansion of macro '__cpu_to_le16'
#define cpu_to_le16 __cpu_to_le16
^
include/asm/io.h:270:6: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_to_le16'
cpu_to_le16(v),__io(p)); })
^
drivers/tty/isicom.c:1058:2: note: in expansion of macro 'outw'
outw((length & 0xff00), base);
^
Apparently, the problem is related to the fact that the value 0xff00,
when used as a 16-bit number, is negative and passed into bitwise
operands of the generic byte swapping code.
Marking the input argument as unsigned in both technically correct
and avoids the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/isicom.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/isicom.c b/drivers/tty/isicom.c
index 858291ca889c..c03ecaa0af7f 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/isicom.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/isicom.c
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int isicom_send_break(struct tty_struct *tty, int length)
outw(0x8000 | ((port->channel) << (card->shift_count)) | 0x3, base);
outw((length & 0xff) << 8 | 0x00, base);
- outw((length & 0xff00), base);
+ outw((length & 0xff00u), base);
InterruptTheCard(base);
unlock_card(card);
--
2.9.0