This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
pwm: rockchip: State of PWM clock should synchronize with PWM enabled state
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
pwm-rockchip-state-of-pwm-clock-should-synchronize-with-pwm-enabled-state.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From a900152b5c29aea8134cc7a4c5db25552b3cd8f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Wu <david.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:10:55 +0800
Subject: pwm: rockchip: State of PWM clock should synchronize with PWM enabled state
From: David Wu <david.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit a900152b5c29aea8134cc7a4c5db25552b3cd8f7 upstream.
If the PWM was not enabled at U-Boot loader, PWM could not work for
clock always disabled at PWM driver. The PWM clock is enabled at
beginning of pwm_apply(), but disabled at end of pwm_apply().
If the PWM was enabled at U-Boot loader, PWM clock is always enabled
unless closed by ATF. The pwm-backlight might turn off the power at
early suspend, should disable PWM clock for saving power consume.
It is important to provide opportunity to enable/disable clock at PWM
driver, the PWM consumer should ensure correct order to call PWM enable
and disable, and PWM driver ensure state of PWM clock synchronized with
PWM enabled state.
Fixes: 2bf1c98aa5a4 ("pwm: rockchip: Add support for atomic update")
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
@@ -191,6 +191,28 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_config(struct pw
return 0;
}
+static int rockchip_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+ struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ bool enable,
+ enum pwm_polarity polarity)
+{
+ struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (enable) {
+ ret = clk_enable(pc->clk);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, enable, polarity);
+
+ if (!enable)
+ clk_disable(pc->clk);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct pwm_state *state)
{
@@ -207,22 +229,26 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm
return ret;
if (state->polarity != curstate.polarity && enabled) {
- pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, false, state->polarity);
+ ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, false, state->polarity);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
enabled = false;
}
ret = rockchip_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
if (ret) {
if (enabled != curstate.enabled)
- pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, !enabled,
- state->polarity);
-
+ rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, !enabled,
+ state->polarity);
goto out;
}
- if (state->enabled != enabled)
- pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, state->enabled,
- state->polarity);
+ if (state->enabled != enabled) {
+ ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, state->enabled,
+ state->polarity);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+ }
/*
* Update the state with the real hardware, which can differ a bit
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from david.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.9/pwm-rockchip-state-of-pwm-clock-should-synchronize-with-pwm-enabled-state.patch