Re: [PATCH 2/3] orangefs: Dan Carpenter influenced cleanups...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:27:25AM -0400, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:41:27PM -0400, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
> > > From: Mike Marshall <hubcap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > commit 05973c2efb40122f2a9ecde2d065f7ea5068d024 upstream.
> > > 
> > > This patch is simlar to one Dan Carpenter sent me, cleans
> > > up some return codes and whitespace errors. There was one
> > > place where he thought inserting an error message into
> > > the ring buffer might be too chatty, I hope I convinced him
> > > othewise. As a consolation <g> I changed a truly chatty
> > > error message in another location into a debug message,
> > > system-admins had already yelled at me about that one...
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Marshall <hubcap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > I have removed the return code and whitespace fixes as they do not cause
> > > a real bug.  I keep the removal of an error message.  This error shows
> > > up when a process dies before the OrangeFS userspace client responds.
> > > This happens all the time on production systems and fills up the ring
> > > buffer.
> > 
> > No, please keep patches identical to what is in Linus's tree.  That way
> > you don't mess something up, and any future patches over the next 2+
> > years the kernel tree will be around apply cleanly.
> > 
> > Almost every single time we "modify" a patch from what is in Linus's
> > tree it is broken.
> > 
> > I've taken the original patch here for 4.9 and 4.10 stable trees.
> 
> I based that on this line in stable-kernel-rules.rst
> 
>  - It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
>    whitespace cleanups, etc).
> 
> but I do see your point.  Does that just mean pure trivial patches are
> inappropriate, but that if one or two trivial changes comes part and
> parcel with a more significant patch it should be kept?

Yes.  You shouldn't be taking patches that do more than one thing in a
single patch anyway :)

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]