4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit e11f8b7b6c4ea13bf8af6b8f42b45e15b554a92b upstream.
While running generic/340 in my test setup I hit the following race. It
can happen with kernels that support FS DAX PMDs, so v4.10 thru
v4.11-rc5.
Thread 1 Thread 2
-------- --------
dax_iomap_pmd_fault()
grab_mapping_entry()
spin_lock_irq()
get_unlocked_mapping_entry()
'entry' is NULL, can't call lock_slot()
spin_unlock_irq()
radix_tree_preload()
dax_iomap_pmd_fault()
grab_mapping_entry()
spin_lock_irq()
get_unlocked_mapping_entry()
...
lock_slot()
spin_unlock_irq()
dax_pmd_insert_mapping()
<inserts a PMD mapping>
spin_lock_irq()
__radix_tree_insert() fails with -EEXIST
<fall back to 4k fault, and die horribly
when inserting a 4k entry where a PMD exists>
The issue is that we have to drop mapping->tree_lock while calling
radix_tree_preload(), but since we didn't have a radix tree entry to
lock (unlike in the pmd_downgrade case) we have no protection against
Thread 2 coming along and inserting a PMD at the same index. For 4k
entries we handled this with a special-case response to -EEXIST coming
from the __radix_tree_insert(), but this doesn't save us for PMDs
because the -EEXIST case can also mean that we collided with a 4k entry
in the radix tree at a different index, but one that is covered by our
PMD range.
So, correctly handle both the 4k and 2M collision cases by explicitly
re-checking the radix tree for an entry at our index once we reacquire
mapping->tree_lock.
This patch has made it through a clean xfstests run with the current
v4.11-rc5 based linux/master, and it also ran generic/340 500 times in a
loop. It used to fail within the first 10 iterations.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170406212944.2866-1-ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dax.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -369,6 +369,22 @@ restart:
}
spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ if (!entry) {
+ /*
+ * We needed to drop the page_tree lock while calling
+ * radix_tree_preload() and we didn't have an entry to
+ * lock. See if another thread inserted an entry at
+ * our index during this time.
+ */
+ entry = __radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, index,
+ NULL, &slot);
+ if (entry) {
+ radix_tree_preload_end();
+ spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ goto restart;
+ }
+ }
+
if (pmd_downgrade) {
radix_tree_delete(&mapping->page_tree, index);
mapping->nrexceptional--;
@@ -384,19 +400,12 @@ restart:
if (err) {
spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
/*
- * Someone already created the entry? This is a
- * normal failure when inserting PMDs in a range
- * that already contains PTEs. In that case we want
- * to return -EEXIST immediately.
- */
- if (err == -EEXIST && !(size_flag & RADIX_DAX_PMD))
- goto restart;
- /*
- * Our insertion of a DAX PMD entry failed, most
- * likely because it collided with a PTE sized entry
- * at a different index in the PMD range. We haven't
- * inserted anything into the radix tree and have no
- * waiters to wake.
+ * Our insertion of a DAX entry failed, most likely
+ * because we were inserting a PMD entry and it
+ * collided with a PTE sized entry at a different
+ * index in the PMD range. We haven't inserted
+ * anything into the radix tree and have no waiters to
+ * wake.
*/
return ERR_PTR(err);
}