Amir, Am 30.03.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Amir Goldstein: >> Reading deeper into the proved that I was wrong. >> AFAIKT UBIFS' journal has currently no way to revive a deleted inode. >> So, we have to think about a new solution. >> > > Not that I know anything about ubifs, but why do you need the deleted > inode record in the first place for an O_TMPFILE. > vfs ensures you that you can only link back an O_TMPFILE, not a deleted > inode. > > It does not appear to be the right thing to do to pass deletion=1 to > ubifs_jnl_update(), but deletion=0 doesn't look right as well.. We need to think of a new case. I choose deletion=1 to ensure that after a power-cut written data of the tmpfile gets removed. Thanks, //richard