[PATCH 4.9 13/16] metag/ptrace: Reject partial NT_METAG_RPIPE writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>

commit 7195ee3120d878259e8d94a5d9f808116f34d5ea upstream.

It's not clear what behaviour is sensible when doing partial write of
NT_METAG_RPIPE, so just don't bother.

This patch assumes that userspace will never rely on a partial SETREGSET
in this case, since it's not clear what should happen anyway.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 arch/metag/kernel/ptrace.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/metag/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/metag/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ int metag_rp_state_copyin(struct pt_regs
 	unsigned long long *ptr;
 	int ret, i;
 
+	if (count < 4*13)
+		return -EINVAL;
 	/* Read the entire pipeline before making any changes */
 	ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
 				 &rp, 0, 4*13);





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]