4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 7a6d312b50e63f598f5b5914c4fd21878ac2b595 ]
Remove the assumption that IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE.
PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE is the ROM enable bit defined by the PCI spec, so if
we're reading or writing a BAR register value, that's what we should use.
IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE is a corresponding bit in struct resource flags.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev,
mask64 = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
}
} else {
- res->flags |= (l & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE);
+ if (l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE)
+ res->flags |= IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE;
l64 = l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
sz64 = sz & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
mask64 = (u32)PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;