This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled jbd2: don't leak memory if setting up journal fails to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: jbd2-don-t-leak-memory-if-setting-up-journal-fails.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From cd9cb405e0b948363811dc74dbb2890f56f2cb87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:08:48 -0400 Subject: jbd2: don't leak memory if setting up journal fails From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> commit cd9cb405e0b948363811dc74dbb2890f56f2cb87 upstream. In journal_init_common(), if we failed to allocate the j_wbuf array, or if we failed to create the buffer_head for the journal superblock, we leaked the memory allocated for the revocation tables. Fix this. Fixes: f0c9fd5458bacf7b12a9a579a727dc740cbe047e Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/jbd2/journal.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c @@ -1125,10 +1125,8 @@ static journal_t *journal_init_common(st /* Set up a default-sized revoke table for the new mount. */ err = jbd2_journal_init_revoke(journal, JOURNAL_REVOKE_DEFAULT_HASH); - if (err) { - kfree(journal); - return NULL; - } + if (err) + goto err_cleanup; spin_lock_init(&journal->j_history_lock); @@ -1145,23 +1143,25 @@ static journal_t *journal_init_common(st journal->j_wbufsize = n; journal->j_wbuf = kmalloc_array(n, sizeof(struct buffer_head *), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!journal->j_wbuf) { - kfree(journal); - return NULL; - } + if (!journal->j_wbuf) + goto err_cleanup; bh = getblk_unmovable(journal->j_dev, start, journal->j_blocksize); if (!bh) { pr_err("%s: Cannot get buffer for journal superblock\n", __func__); - kfree(journal->j_wbuf); - kfree(journal); - return NULL; + goto err_cleanup; } journal->j_sb_buffer = bh; journal->j_superblock = (journal_superblock_t *)bh->b_data; return journal; + +err_cleanup: + kfree(journal->j_wbuf); + jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke(journal); + kfree(journal); + return NULL; } /* jbd2_journal_init_dev and jbd2_journal_init_inode: --- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ int jbd2_journal_init_revoke(journal_t * fail1: jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[0]); + journal->j_revoke_table[0] = NULL; fail0: return -ENOMEM; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.9/ext4-mark-inode-dirty-after-converting-inline-directory.patch queue-4.9/jbd2-don-t-leak-memory-if-setting-up-journal-fails.patch