3.2.50-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit fec386ac1428f9c0e672df952cbca5cebd4e4e2f upstream.
We aren't setting path->locks[level] when we resume a snapshot deletion which
means we won't unlock the buffer when we free the path. This causes deadlocks
if we happen to re-allocate the block before we've evicted the extent buffer
from cache. Thanks,
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -6614,6 +6614,7 @@ void btrfs_drop_snapshot(struct btrfs_ro
while (1) {
btrfs_tree_lock(path->nodes[level]);
btrfs_set_lock_blocking(path->nodes[level]);
+ path->locks[level] = BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK_BLOCKING;
ret = btrfs_lookup_extent_info(trans, root,
path->nodes[level]->start,
@@ -6627,6 +6628,7 @@ void btrfs_drop_snapshot(struct btrfs_ro
break;
btrfs_tree_unlock(path->nodes[level]);
+ path->locks[level] = 0;
WARN_ON(wc->refs[level] != 1);
level--;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html