The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 68925176296a8b995e503349200e256674bfe5ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:32:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: Clear HCR_TGE when invalidating guest TLBs
When invalidating guest TLBs, special care must be taken to
actually shoot the guest TLBs and not the host ones if we're
running on a VHE system. This is controlled by the HCR_EL2.TGE
bit, which we forget to clear before invalidating TLBs.
Address the issue by introducing two wrappers (__tlb_switch_to_guest
and __tlb_switch_to_host) that take care of both the VTTBR_EL2
and HCR_EL2.TGE switching.
Reported-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tnowicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tnowicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
index e8e7ba2bc11f..9e1d2b75eecd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
@@ -18,14 +18,62 @@
#include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ u64 val;
+
+ /*
+ * With VHE enabled, we have HCR_EL2.{E2H,TGE} = {1,1}, and
+ * most TLB operations target EL2/EL0. In order to affect the
+ * guest TLBs (EL1/EL0), we need to change one of these two
+ * bits. Changing E2H is impossible (goodbye TTBR1_EL2), so
+ * let's flip TGE before executing the TLB operation.
+ */
+ write_sysreg(kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2);
+ val = read_sysreg(hcr_el2);
+ val &= ~HCR_TGE;
+ write_sysreg(val, hcr_el2);
+ isb();
+}
+
+static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ write_sysreg(kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2);
+ isb();
+}
+
+static hyp_alternate_select(__tlb_switch_to_guest,
+ __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe,
+ __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe,
+ ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
+
+static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ /*
+ * We're done with the TLB operation, let's restore the host's
+ * view of HCR_EL2.
+ */
+ write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
+ write_sysreg(HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS, hcr_el2);
+}
+
+static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
+}
+
+static hyp_alternate_select(__tlb_switch_to_host,
+ __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe,
+ __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe,
+ ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
+
void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
{
dsb(ishst);
/* Switch to requested VMID */
kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
- write_sysreg(kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2);
- isb();
+ __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm);
/*
* We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
@@ -46,7 +94,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
dsb(ish);
isb();
- write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
+ __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm);
}
void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm)
@@ -55,14 +103,13 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm)
/* Switch to requested VMID */
kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
- write_sysreg(kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2);
- isb();
+ __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm);
__tlbi(vmalls12e1is);
dsb(ish);
isb();
- write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
+ __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm);
}
void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -70,14 +117,13 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm *kvm = kern_hyp_va(kern_hyp_va(vcpu)->kvm);
/* Switch to requested VMID */
- write_sysreg(kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2);
- isb();
+ __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm);
__tlbi(vmalle1);
dsb(nsh);
isb();
- write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
+ __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm);
}
void __hyp_text __kvm_flush_vm_context(void)