On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:07:11PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Filesystem encryption ostensibly supported revoking a keyring key that
> had been used to "unlock" encrypted files, causing those files to become
> "locked" again. This was, however, buggy for several reasons, the most
> severe of which was that when key revocation happened to be detected for
> an inode, its fscrypt_info was immediately freed, even while other
> threads could be using it for encryption or decryption concurrently.
> This could be exploited to crash the kernel or worse.
>
> This patch fixes the use-after-free by removing the code which detects
> the keyring key having been revoked, invalidated, or expired. Instead,
> an encrypted inode that is "unlocked" now simply remains unlocked until
> it is evicted from memory. Note that this is no worse than the case for
> block device-level encryption, e.g. dm-crypt, and it still remains
> possible for a privileged user to evict unused pages, inodes, and
> dentries by running 'sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches', or by
> simply unmounting the filesystem. In fact, one of those actions was
> already needed anyway for key revocation to work even somewhat sanely.
> This change is not expected to break any applications.
>
> In the future I'd like to implement a real API for fscrypt key
> revocation that interacts sanely with ongoing filesystem operations ---
> waiting for existing operations to complete and blocking new operations,
> and invalidating and sanitizing key material and plaintext from the VFS
> caches. But this is a hard problem, and for now this bug must be fixed.
>
> This bug affected almost all versions of ext4, f2fs, and ubifs
> encryption, and it was potentially reachable in any kernel configured
> with encryption support (CONFIG_EXT4_ENCRYPTION=y,
> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION=y, CONFIG_F2FS_FS_ENCRYPTION=y, or
> CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION=y). Note that older kernels did not use the
> shared fs/crypto/ code, but due to the potential security implications
> of this bug, it may still be worthwhile to backport this fix to them.
>
> Fixes: b7236e21d55f ("ext4 crypto: reorganize how we store keys in the inode")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.2+
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Ted, can this be sent to Linus soon? This needs to be fixed as it's a security
vulnerability on some systems.
Eric