Re: Patch "loop: fix LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN hang" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/08/2017 08:52 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 07:47 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 03/08/2017 08:39 AM, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>>>
>>>     loop: fix LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN hang
>>>
>>> to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
>>>     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>>>
>>> The filename of the patch is:
>>>      loop-fix-lo_flags_partscan-hang.patch
>>> and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.
>>>
>>> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
>>> please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>>>
>>>
>>> From e02898b423802b1f3a3aaa7f16e896da069ba8f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
>>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:42:38 -0800
>>> Subject: loop: fix LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN hang
>>>
>>> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
>>>
>>> commit e02898b423802b1f3a3aaa7f16e896da069ba8f7 upstream.
>>>
>>> loop_reread_partitions() needs to do I/O, but we just froze the queue,
>>> so we end up waiting forever. This can easily be reproduced with losetup
>>> -P. Fix it by moving the reread to after we unfreeze the queue.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ecdd09597a57 ("block/loop: fix race between I/O and set_status")
>>> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Why is this being added to a bunch of trees that don't have the commit
>> that it fixes? It should not go into any of these.
>>
> 
> The commit it fixes was marked for stable, which is why I also marked this
> one for stable. And it looks like that commit is also queued up for these
> stable releases:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-4.10/block-loop-fix-race-between-i-o-and-set_status.patch
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-4.9/block-loop-fix-race-between-i-o-and-set_status.patch
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-4.4/block-loop-fix-race-between-i-o-and-set_status.patch
> 
> So it should be okay.

Ah yes, that makes sense, I missed that.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]