Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/20] 4.4.50-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/20] 4.4.50-stable review
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:43:47 -0800
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx, shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <58a74eeb.c910190a.1e315.c4dd@mx.google.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:28:43AM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc boot: 31 boots: 0 failed, 31 passed (v4.4.49-21-g967e7e889dce)

Better than the 4.9 number of boots, but still odd...

References:
- [PATCH 4.4 00/20] 4.4.50-stable review
  - From: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/32] 4.9.11-stable review
Next by Date: [patch 1/1] printk: use rcuidle console tracepoint
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/20] 4.4.50-stable review
Next by thread: [PATCH 4.9 00/32] 4.9.11-stable review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]