[PATCH v2] md linear: fix a race between linear_add() and linear_congested()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Recently I receie a report that on Linux v3.0 based kerenl, hot add disk
to a md linear device causes kernel crash at linear_congested(). From the
crash image analysis, I find in linear_congested(), mddev->raid_disks
contains value N, but conf->disks[] only has N-1 pointers available. Then
a pointer deference to a NULL pointer crashes the kernel.

There is a race between linear_add() and linear_congested(), RCU stuffs
used in these two functions cannot avoid the race. Since Linuv v4.0
RCU code is replaced by introducing mddev_suspend().  After checking the
upstream code, it seems linear_congested() is not called in
generic_make_request() code patch, so mddev_suspend() cannot provent it
from being called. The possible race still exists.

Here I explain how the race still exists in current code.  For a machine
has many CPUs, on one CPU, linear_add() is called to add a hard disk to a
md linear device; at the same time on other CPU, linear_congested() is
called to detect whether this md linear device is congested before issuing
an I/O request onto it.

Now I use a possible code execution time sequence to demo how the possible
race happens,

seq    linear_add()                linear_congested()
 0                                 conf=mddev->private
 1   oldconf=mddev->private
 2   mddev->raid_disks++
 3                              for (i=0; i<mddev->raid_disks;i++)
 4                                bdev_get_queue(conf->disks[i].rdev->bdev)
 5   mddev->private=newconf

In linear_add() mddev->raid_disks is increased in time seq 2, and on
another CPU in linear_congested() the for-loop iterates conf->disks[i] by
the increased mddev->raid_disks in time seq 3,4. But conf with one more
element (which is a pointer to struct dev_info type) to conf->disks[] is
not updated yet, accessing its structure member in time seq 4 will cause a
NULL pointer deference fault.

The fix includes 2 parts of modification,
 1) In linear_add(), update mddev->private with new value before
    increasing mddev->raid_disks, and to make sure on other CPUs their are
    seen to be updated in same order as linear_add() does (otherwise the
    race may still happen), a smp_mb() is necessary.
 2) RCU stuffs are back, to make sure in linear_add() the oldconf won't be
    destoried when it is still referenced in linear_congested().

A question is, by this fix, if mddev->private is update to new value in
linear_add(), but in linear_congested() the for-loop still tests old value
of mddev->raid_disks, then the iteration will miss the last element of
conf->disks[]. My answer is don't worry it, it's OK. the reasons are,
 - When updating mddev->private, the md linear device is suspend, no I/O
   may happen, it is safe to missing congestion status of the last
   new-added hard disk.
 - In the worst case linear_congested() returns 0 and I/O sent to this md
   linear device, but the new added hard disk is congested, then the I/O
   request will be blocked for a while if it just happenly hits the new
   added hard disk. linear_congested() is in code path of wb_congested(),
   which is quite hot in write back code path. Comparing to add locking
   code in linear_congested(), the cost of the worst case is acceptable.

The bug is reported on Linux v3.0 based kernel, it can and should be
applied to all kernels since Linux v3.0. I see linear_add() is merged into
mainline since Linux v2.6.18, maybe stable kernel maintainers after this
version may consider to pick this fix as well.

Changelog:
 - v2: add RCU stuffs by suggestion from Shaohua and Neil.
 - v1: initial effort.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 drivers/md/linear.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/linear.c b/drivers/md/linear.c
index 5975c99..4f1690c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/linear.c
+++ b/drivers/md/linear.c
@@ -58,13 +58,15 @@ static int linear_congested(struct mddev *mddev, int bits)
 	struct linear_conf *conf;
 	int i, ret = 0;
 
-	conf = mddev->private;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	conf = rcu_dereference(mddev->private);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < mddev->raid_disks && !ret ; i++) {
 		struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(conf->disks[i].rdev->bdev);
 		ret |= bdi_congested(&q->backing_dev_info, bits);
 	}
 
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -173,6 +175,13 @@ static int linear_run (struct mddev *mddev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void free_conf(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	struct linear_conf *conf =
+			container_of(head, struct linear_conf, rcu);
+	kfree(conf);
+}
+
 static int linear_add(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
 {
 	/* Adding a drive to a linear array allows the array to grow.
@@ -196,15 +205,27 @@ static int linear_add(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
 	if (!newconf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	/* In linear_congested(), mddev->raid_disks and mddev->private
+	 * are accessed without protection by mddev_suspend(). If on
+	 * another CPU,  in linear_congested() mddev->private is still seen
+	 * to contains old value but mddev->raid_disks is seen to have the
+	 * increased value, the last iteration to conf->disks[i].rdev will
+	 * trigger a NULL pointer deference. To avoid this race, here
+	 * mddev->private must be updated before increasing
+	 * mddev->raid_disks, and a smp_mb() is required between them. Then
+	 * in linear_congested(), we are sure the updated mddev->private is
+	 * seen when iterating conf->disks[i].
+	 */
 	mddev_suspend(mddev);
-	oldconf = mddev->private;
+	oldconf = rcu_dereference(mddev->private);
+	rcu_assign_pointer(mddev->private, newconf);
+	smp_mb();
 	mddev->raid_disks++;
-	mddev->private = newconf;
 	md_set_array_sectors(mddev, linear_size(mddev, 0, 0));
 	set_capacity(mddev->gendisk, mddev->array_sectors);
 	mddev_resume(mddev);
 	revalidate_disk(mddev->gendisk);
-	kfree(oldconf);
+	call_rcu(&oldconf->rcu, free_conf);
 	return 0;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]