From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. =============== commit 1be5d4fa0af34fb7bafa205aeb59f5c7cc7a089d upstream. While debugging the rtmutex unlock vs. dequeue race Will suggested to use READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner() as it might race against the cmpxchg_release() in unlock_rt_mutex_safe(). Will: "It's a minor thing which will most likely not matter in practice" Careful search did not unearth an actual problem in todays code, but it's better to be safe than surprised. Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130210030.431379999@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> --- kernel/rtmutex_common.h | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h index 53a66c85261b..1823c094fe96 100644 --- a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h @@ -96,8 +96,9 @@ task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p) static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) { - return (struct task_struct *) - ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_OWNER_MASKALL); + unsigned long owner = (unsigned long) READ_ONCE(lock->owner); + + return (struct task_struct *) (owner & ~RT_MUTEX_OWNER_MASKALL); } /* -- 2.11.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html