From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. =============== commit ef37427ac5677331145ab27a17e6f5f1b43f0c11 upstream. Similarly to the aemif clock - this screws up the linked list of clock children. Create a separate clock for mdio inheriting the rate from emac_clk. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [nsekhar@xxxxxx: add a comment over mdio_clk to explaing its existence + commit headline updates] Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c index f56e5fbfa2fd..25f11492c33f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c @@ -297,6 +297,16 @@ static struct clk emac_clk = { .gpsc = 1, }; +/* + * In order to avoid adding the emac_clk to the clock lookup table twice (and + * screwing up the linked list in the process) create a separate clock for + * mdio inheriting the rate from emac_clk. + */ +static struct clk mdio_clk = { + .name = "mdio", + .parent = &emac_clk, +}; + static struct clk mcasp_clk = { .name = "mcasp", .parent = &pll0_sysclk2, @@ -461,7 +471,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = { CLK(NULL, "arm", &arm_clk), CLK(NULL, "rmii", &rmii_clk), CLK("davinci_emac.1", NULL, &emac_clk), - CLK("davinci_mdio.0", "fck", &emac_clk), + CLK("davinci_mdio.0", "fck", &mdio_clk), CLK("davinci-mcasp.0", NULL, &mcasp_clk), CLK("da8xx_lcdc.0", "fck", &lcdc_clk), CLK("da830-mmc.0", NULL, &mmcsd0_clk), -- 2.11.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html