Re: [PATCH 4.9 033/120] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcoded socket 0 assumption in the Haswell init code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 05:32:46AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 01/18/2017 05:25 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> 4.9 is broken and requires additional patches beyond this patch.  Applying this 
> > >> patch to 4.9 stable without those additional fixes will result in kernel panics 
> > >> on some Haswell systems that boot on random cores.
> > > 
> > > Could you list the patches that are required? It would be nice to backport all 
> > > required fixes to v4.9.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah, I'm going to do that once I get the system back.  I have a feeling that
> > just the two additional patches are required but I want to make sure before I
> > post anything.
> 
> So what do I do here?  Drop this single patch?  Add others now?  Ignore
> it and leave it as-is?
> 
> still confused,

Please drop the patch for now - we'll sort it all out and will send you a list of 
commit IDs to backport once everything's clear!

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]