Re: [PATCH] coresight: STM: Balance enable/disable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/01/17 11:41, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
On 11 January 2017 at 01:36, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:21:55AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
The stm is automatically enabled when an application sets the policy
via ->link() call back by using coresight_enable(), which keeps the
refcount of the current users of the STM. However, the unlink() callback
issues stm_disable() directly, which leaves the STM turned off, without
the coresight layer knowing about it. This prevents any further uses
of the STM hardware as the coresight layer still thinks the STM is
turned on and doesn't issue an stm_enable(). Even manually enabling
the STM via sysfs can't really enable the hw.

e.g,

$ echo 1 > $CS_DEVS/$ETR/enable_sink
$ mkdir -p $CONFIG_FS/stp-policy/$source.0/stm_test/
$ echo 32768 65535 > $CONFIG_FS/stp-policy/$source.0/stm_test/channels
$ echo 64 > $CS_DEVS/$source/traceid
$ ./stm_app
Sending 64000 byte blocks of pattern 0 at 0us intervals
Success to map channel(32768~32783) to 0xffffa95fa000
Sending on channel 32768
$ dd if=/dev/$ETR of=~/trace.bin.1
597+1 records in
597+1 records out
305920 bytes (306 kB) copied, 0.399952 s, 765 kB/s
$ ./stm_app
Sending 64000 byte blocks of pattern 0 at 0us intervals
Success to map channel(32768~32783) to 0xffff7e9e2000
Sending on channel 32768
$ dd if=/dev/$ETR of=~/trace.bin.2
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.0232083 s, 0.0 kB/s

Note that we don't get any data from the ETR for the second session.

Also dmesg shows :

[   77.520458] coresight-tmc 20800000.etr: TMC-ETR enabled
[   77.537097] coresight-replicator etr_replicator@20890000: REPLICATOR enabled
[   77.558828] coresight-replicator main_replicator@208a0000: REPLICATOR enabled
[   77.581068] coresight-funnel 208c0000.main_funnel: FUNNEL inport 0 enabled
[   77.602217] coresight-tmc 20840000.etf: TMC-ETF enabled
[   77.618422] coresight-stm 20860000.stm: STM tracing enabled
[  139.554252] coresight-stm 20860000.stm: STM tracing disabled
 # End of first tracing session
[  146.351135] coresight-tmc 20800000.etr: TMC read start
[  146.514486] coresight-tmc 20800000.etr: TMC read end
 # Note that the STM is not turned on via stm_generic_link()->coresight_enable()
 # and hence none of the components are turned on.
[  152.479080] coresight-tmc 20800000.etr: TMC read start
[  152.542632] coresight-tmc 20800000.etr: TMC read end

This patch balances the unlink operation by using the coresight_disable(),
keeping the coresight layer in sync with the hardware state.

Fixes: commit 237483aa5cf43 ("coresight: stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component")
Cc: Pratik Patel <pratikp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.7+
Reported-by: Robert Walker <robert.walker@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c
index 3524452..57b7330 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static void stm_generic_unlink(struct stm_data *stm_data,
      if (!drvdata || !drvdata->csdev)
              return;

-     stm_disable(drvdata->csdev, NULL);
+     coresight_disable(drvdata->csdev);

This looks valid to me.

Chunyan, any reason to use stm_disable() directly rather than calling it as part
of the device OPS in coresight_disable()?

I don't think there's some special reason for this. I simply hadn't
noticed that these two operations didn't use two balanced functions.

Please can I have an Ack/Reviewed -by on it, so that we can push it
as a fix.


Suzuki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]