On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 10:00 -0500, Robert Jennings wrote:
> When an associativity level change is found for one thread, the
> siblings threads need to be updated as well. This is done today
> for PRRN in stage_topology_update() but is missing for VPHN in
> update_cpu_associativity_changes_mask().
>
> All threads should be updated to move to the new node. Without this
> patch, a single thread may be flagged for a topology change, leaving it
> in a different node from its siblings, which is incorrect. This causes
> problems for the scheduler where overlapping scheduler groups are created
> and a loop is formed in those groups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jennings <rcj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
This is big for a CC stable ... Can you be a bit more verbose on what
the consequences are of not having this patch ? Ie, what happens when "a
loop loop is formed in [the scheduler] groups" ?
Also you shouldn't CC stable on the actual patch email. You should add a
CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> tag along with your Signed-off-by:
Also how far back in stable should this go ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> cpu_sibling_mask is now defined for UP which fixes that build break.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h | 4 +++
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> index ffbaabe..48cfc85 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -145,6 +145,10 @@ extern void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu);
> #define smp_setup_cpu_maps()
> static inline void inhibit_secondary_onlining(void) {}
> static inline void uninhibit_secondary_onlining(void) {}
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_sibling_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> + return cpumask_of(cpu);
> +}
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index 0839721..5850798 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <asm/cputhreads.h>
> #include <asm/sparsemem.h>
> #include <asm/prom.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> @@ -1318,7 +1319,8 @@ static int update_cpu_associativity_changes_mask(void)
> }
> }
> if (changed) {
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, changes);
> + cpumask_or(changes, changes, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
> + cpu = cpu_last_thread_sibling(cpu);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1426,7 +1428,7 @@ static int update_cpu_topology(void *data)
> if (!data)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - cpu = get_cpu();
> + cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> for (update = data; update; update = update->next) {
> if (cpu != update->cpu)
> @@ -1446,12 +1448,12 @@ static int update_cpu_topology(void *data)
> */
> int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
> {
> - unsigned int cpu, changed = 0;
> + unsigned int cpu, sibling, changed = 0;
> struct topology_update_data *updates, *ud;
> unsigned int associativity[VPHN_ASSOC_BUFSIZE] = {0};
> cpumask_t updated_cpus;
> struct device *dev;
> - int weight, i = 0;
> + int weight, new_nid, i = 0;
>
> weight = cpumask_weight(&cpu_associativity_changes_mask);
> if (!weight)
> @@ -1464,19 +1466,46 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
> cpumask_clear(&updated_cpus);
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpu_associativity_changes_mask) {
> - ud = &updates[i++];
> - ud->cpu = cpu;
> - vphn_get_associativity(cpu, associativity);
> - ud->new_nid = associativity_to_nid(associativity);
> -
> - if (ud->new_nid < 0 || !node_online(ud->new_nid))
> - ud->new_nid = first_online_node;
> + /*
> + * If siblings aren't flagged for changes, updates list
> + * will be too short. Skip on this update and set for next
> + * update.
> + */
> + if (!cpumask_subset(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu),
> + &cpu_associativity_changes_mask)) {
> + pr_info("Sibling bits not set for associativity "
> + "change, cpu%d\n", cpu);
> + cpumask_or(&cpu_associativity_changes_mask,
> + &cpu_associativity_changes_mask,
> + cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
> + cpu = cpu_last_thread_sibling(cpu);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> - ud->old_nid = numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu];
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &updated_cpus);
> + /* Use associativity from first thread for all siblings */
> + vphn_get_associativity(cpu, associativity);
> + new_nid = associativity_to_nid(associativity);
> + if (new_nid < 0 || !node_online(new_nid))
> + new_nid = first_online_node;
> +
> + if (new_nid == numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]) {
> + cpumask_andnot(&cpu_associativity_changes_mask,
> + &cpu_associativity_changes_mask,
> + cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
> + cpu = cpu_last_thread_sibling(cpu);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> - if (i < weight)
> - ud->next = &updates[i];
> + for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)) {
> + ud = &updates[i++];
> + ud->cpu = sibling;
> + ud->new_nid = new_nid;
> + ud->old_nid = numa_cpu_lookup_table[sibling];
> + cpumask_set_cpu(sibling, &updated_cpus);
> + if (i < weight)
> + ud->next = &updates[i];
> + }
> + cpu = cpu_last_thread_sibling(cpu);
> }
>
> stop_machine(update_cpu_topology, &updates[0], &updated_cpus);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html