4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit 31b5929d533f5183972cf57a7844b456ed996f3c upstream. There is a disagreement between drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c and drivers/input/input-leds.c with regard to what is a Scroll Lock LED trigger name: input calls it "kbd-scrolllock", but vt calls it "kbd-scrollock" (two l's). This prevents Scroll Lock LED trigger from binding to this LED by default. Since it is a scroLL Lock LED, this interface was introduced only about a year ago and in an Internet search people seem to reference this trigger only to set it to this LED let's simply rename it to "kbd-scrolllock". Also, it looks like this was supposed to be changed before this code was merged: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/9/697 but it was done only on the input side. Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ static void kbd_led_trigger_activate(str KBD_LED_TRIGGER((_led_bit) + 8, _name) static struct kbd_led_trigger kbd_led_triggers[] = { - KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_SCROLLOCK, "kbd-scrollock"), + KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_SCROLLOCK, "kbd-scrolllock"), KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_NUMLOCK, "kbd-numlock"), KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_CAPSLOCK, "kbd-capslock"), KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_KANALOCK, "kbd-kanalock"), -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html