4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 7b650994ab07434ae58a247dc9ac87d2488ca75c upstream.
If we no longer hold any layout segments, we're normally expected to
consider the layout stateid to be invalid. However we cannot assume this
if we're about to, or in the process of sending a layoutreturn.
Fixes: 334a8f37115b ("pNFS: Don't forget the layout stateid if...")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -411,7 +411,9 @@ pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(struct pnfs_layo
list_del_init(&lseg->pls_list);
/* Matched by pnfs_get_layout_hdr in pnfs_layout_insert_lseg */
atomic_dec(&lo->plh_refcount);
- if (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs)) {
+ if (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) &&
+ !test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED, &lo->plh_flags) &&
+ !test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags)) {
if (atomic_read(&lo->plh_outstanding) == 0)
set_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_INVALID_STID, &lo->plh_flags);
clear_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lo->plh_flags);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html