4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit b6cc9474e2dd9f0c19b694b40961d81117f1e918 upstream.
On arm64 NUMA kernels we can pass "numa=off" on the command line to
disable NUMA. A side effect of this is that kmalloc_node() calls to
non-zero nodes will crash the system with an OOPS:
[ 0.000000] ITS@0x0000901000020000: allocated 2097152 Devices @10002000000 (flat, esz 8, psz 64K, shr 1)
[ 0.000000] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00001680
[ 0.000000] pgd = fffffc0009470000
[ 0.000000] [00001680] *pgd=0000010ffff90003, *pud=0000010ffff90003, *pmd=0000010ffff90003, *pte=0000000000000000
[ 0.000000] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP
.
.
.
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00081c8950>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xa4/0xe68
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc000821fa70>] new_slab+0xd0/0x564
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008221e24>] ___slab_alloc+0x2e4/0x514
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008239498>] __slab_alloc+0x48/0x58
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008222c20>] __kmalloc_node+0xd0/0x2dc
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008115374>] __irq_domain_add+0x7c/0x164
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b461dc>] its_probe+0x784/0x81c
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b462bc>] its_init+0x48/0x1b0
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b4543c>] gic_init_bases+0x228/0x360
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b456bc>] gic_of_init+0x148/0x1cc
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b5aec8>] of_irq_init+0x184/0x298
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b43f9c>] irqchip_init+0x14/0x38
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b12d60>] init_IRQ+0xc/0x30
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b10a3c>] start_kernel+0x240/0x3b8
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b101c4>] __primary_switched+0x30/0x6c
[ 0.000000] Code: 912ec2a0 b9403809 0a0902fb 37b007db (f9400300)
.
.
.
This is caused by code like this in kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
domain = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*domain) + (sizeof(unsigned int) * size),
GFP_KERNEL, of_node_to_nid(of_node));
When NUMA is disabled, the concept of a node is really undefined, so
of_node_to_nid() should unconditionally return NUMA_NO_NODE.
Fix by returning NUMA_NO_NODE when the nid is not in the set of
possible nodes.
Reported-by: Gilbert Netzer <noname@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/of/of_numa.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
@@ -176,7 +176,12 @@ int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *d
np->name);
of_node_put(np);
- if (!r)
+ /*
+ * If numa=off passed on command line, or with a defective
+ * device tree, the nid may not be in the set of possible
+ * nodes. Check for this case and return NUMA_NO_NODE.
+ */
+ if (!r && nid < MAX_NUMNODES && node_possible(nid))
return nid;
return NUMA_NO_NODE;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html