The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.9-stable tree. I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From e285a9a64d64e65a10e97c6ae1e9385c9595b563 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Flora Cui <Flora.Cui@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:29:54 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: update rev id for pitcairn Signed-off-by: Flora Cui <Flora.Cui@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c index 19b511e984dc..cf8a0a104875 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c @@ -1212,6 +1212,7 @@ static int si_common_early_init(void *handle) AMD_CG_SUPPORT_HDP_LS | AMD_CG_SUPPORT_HDP_MGCG; adev->pg_flags = 0; + adev->external_rev_id = adev->rev_id + 20; break; case CHIP_VERDE: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html