WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: update rev id for verde" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 4.9-stable tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.9-stable tree.

I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.

I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to 
<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and let me know why this patch should be
applied.  Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From f815b29cea0968df400f8c9f8b770ec02ec66906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Flora Cui <Flora.Cui@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:27:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: update rev id for verde

Signed-off-by: Flora Cui <Flora.Cui@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c
index 2a99a41553b4..c46b0159007d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c
@@ -1229,7 +1229,7 @@ static int si_common_early_init(void *handle)
 			AMD_CG_SUPPORT_HDP_MGCG;
 		adev->pg_flags = 0;
 		//???
-		adev->external_rev_id = adev->rev_id + 0x14;
+		adev->external_rev_id = adev->rev_id + 40;
 		break;
 	case CHIP_OLAND:
 		adev->cg_flags =

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]