Re: Will backports to 3.10 kernel for avoiding IPv6 crashes be accepted?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mike,

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 03:42:36PM +0000, Mike Manning wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Will you in principle accept submission of patches for backports to the 3.10 kernel?

We accept fixes as long as they :
  1) exist in mainline, or have a good reason for not being there (eg: bug was
     accidently fixed later)

  2) do not break existing setups or change any behaviour

  3) are auditable by people who know the code

  4) are not rejected by the relevant subsystem maintainers

> If so, I will start submitting some patches on a one-by-one basis for the
> following.
(...)
> These crashes have been resolved by backporting to 3.10 a set of 6 patches
> from kernel versions 3.11-3.14 (a couple of these backports whilst useful are
> only to make subsequent fixes cleaner to patch).

Well, let's see. I'm a bit late these days on 3.10 unfortunately but I still
have some fixes waiting in the queue for 3.10.105, so if your fixes are OK,
I'm fine with including them as well.

Thanks,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]