On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 02:09:04 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I wanted the simplest fix for stable. > > I think a simpler fix is just to return when it sees a negative record.. You're right, but I guess I was trying to get it someone closer to the final change too. -- Steve > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c > index 52fb1e21b86b..2fb73c2e35b5 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c > @@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ print_graph_entry_leaf(struct trace_iterator *iter, > > /* If a graph tracer ignored set_graph_notrace */ > if (call->depth < -1) > - call->depth += FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH; > + return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED; > > /* > * Comments display at + 1 to depth. Since > @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ print_graph_entry_nested(struct trace_iterator *iter, > > /* If a graph tracer ignored set_graph_notrace */ > if (call->depth < -1) > - call->depth += FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH; > + return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED; > > cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu); > cpu_data->depth = call->depth; > > > Thanks, > Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html