From: Stephen Suryaputra Lin <stephen.suryaputra.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
[ Upstream commit 969447f226b451c453ddc83cac6144eaeac6f2e3 ]
In v2.6, ip_rt_redirect() calls arp_bind_neighbour() which returns 0
and then the state of the neigh for the new_gw is checked. If the state
isn't valid then the redirected route is deleted. This behavior is
maintained up to v3.5.7 by check_peer_redirect() because rt->rt_gateway
is assigned to peer->redirect_learned.a4 before calling
ipv4_neigh_lookup().
After commit 5943634fc559 ("ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info in
struct rtable again."), ipv4_neigh_lookup() is performed without the
rt_gateway assigned to the new_gw. In the case when rt_gateway (old_gw)
isn't zero, the function uses it as the key. The neigh is most likely
valid since the old_gw is the one that sends the ICMP redirect message.
Then the new_gw is assigned to fib_nh_exception. The problem is: the
new_gw ARP may never gets resolved and the traffic is blackholed.
So, use the new_gw for neigh lookup.
Changes from v1:
- use __ipv4_neigh_lookup instead (per Eric Dumazet).
Fixes: 5943634fc559 ("ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info in struct rtable again.")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra Lin <ssurya@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index f1631aec4206..fd2811086257 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -764,7 +764,9 @@ static void __ip_do_redirect(struct rtable *rt, struct sk_buff *skb, struct flow
goto reject_redirect;
}
- n = ipv4_neigh_lookup(&rt->dst, NULL, &new_gw);
+ n = __ipv4_neigh_lookup(rt->dst.dev, new_gw);
+ if (!n)
+ n = neigh_create(&arp_tbl, &new_gw, rt->dst.dev);
if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
if (!(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
neigh_event_send(n, NULL);
--
2.10.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html