Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] fscrypto: don't use on-stack buffer for key derivation" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 4.8-stable tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:01:20AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:39:02PM +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.8-stable tree.
> > 
> > I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
> > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.
> > 
> > I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to 
> > <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and let me know why this patch should be
> > applied.  Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
> > seen again.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Indeed, as far as I'm concerned you should drop these two patches.  They fix
> problems with virtually-mapped stacks which were added in 4.9, so there's no
> need to apply them to older kernels.  I think Cc stable was left on by accident
> because the patches were originally going to wait until 4.10.

Ok, thanks, both now dropped.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]