4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 98756f5319c64c883caa910dce702d9edefe7810 upstream.
Commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
replaced the addition of PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING in acpi_pci_link_allocate()
with an addition in acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(), but f7eca374f000
("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation") removed the use
of acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() for ISA IRQs.
Therefore, PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING is missing from ISA IRQs used by
interrupt links. Include that penalty by adding it in the
acpi_pci_link_allocate() path.
Fixes: f7eca374f000 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation)
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -608,6 +608,10 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct
acpi_device_bid(link->device));
return -ENODEV;
} else {
+ if (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
+ acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
+ PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+
printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
acpi_device_name(link->device),
acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html