On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 17:13 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > 3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> Sorry for the late review, but this patch is actually tagged for
> stable kernels >= 3.9 ("Cc: 3.9+ <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"). But it
> is probably harmless and not worth the trouble of reverting them from
> 3.0 and 3.4.
I don't think it does any good without the preceding fix (commit
2fa97feb4406c546b52e35b6b6c50cb8f63425d2) which unfortunately requires
3.9. I don't know whether it will make things any worse.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part