Re: stable-rc build: 72 warnings 1 failures (stable-rc/v4.4.30-35-gf821e08)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 9:16:28 AM CET Olof's autobuilder wrote:
>>> Here are the build results from automated periodic testing.
>>>
>>> The tree being built was stable-rc, found at:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/
>>>
>>> Topmost commit:
>>>
>>> f821e08 Linux 4.4.31-rc1
>>>
>>> Build logs (stderr only) can be found at the following link (experimental):
>>>
>>> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/stable-rc/v4.4.30-35-gf821e08/
>>
>> These seem to be largely caused by building with gcc-6. It's probably
>> a good idea to keep supporting that configuration though and
>> backport the fixes. Here are the upstream commit IDs I've found.
>
> That's a lot of noise. I'll move back to build with gcc 4.9.2 instead, for now.
>
> It's not entirely reasonable to expect older releases to build with
> new toolchains without warnings, and I'm not sure if it makes sense to
> bring back those fixes to -stable (unless they fix real bugs, of
> course).

A lot less noise with older gcc:

http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/stable-rc/v4.4.30-44-gc5be865/


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]