On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:23:09PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 11/03/2016 02:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:32PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> The current code doesn't even compile .... > > > > Give a better description in the log, especially if this patch is supposed to > > go to stable@ > > OK. [ ... ] > > Is the condition correct ? If I refer to your previous answer, the bit will be > > set for status if the counter wrapped up. So in this case, we won't exit the > > loop until we wrap up, no ? > > No thats not what I meant. Bit being set there means things are fine (no interrupt > taken, no increment of high after low was readetc). All I changed here was use of > 0x8000_0000 to the macro. BBIT0 in assembler means branch if bit was clear. Fair enough. So the logic is inverted 'status' == 0 means 'not fine'. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html