On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 23:11 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 07/15/2013 02:27:56 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > > Before the "3.10.1-stable review" thread degenerated into a > > disagreement > > about habits of politeness, there were some solid points being made > > which, I think, bear consideration and which may now be lost. > > > > The problem, as Jiří Kosina put is succinctly is that the > > distributions > > are finding stable less useful because it contains to much stuff > > they'd > > classify as not stable material. > > Does anybody actually review hundred-patch dumps for stable stuff? [...] I review what I can, but recently have often missed the 2 day review period. Review from the authors and maintainers is probably more valuable than that from generalists on the stable list. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The most exhausting thing in life is being insincere. - Anne Morrow Lindberg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part