On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:25:24PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:45:25PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 07/19/2013 09:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > --------------- > > > Note, this is the LAST 3.9-stable kernel release that I will be doing. > > > Please move to the 3.10-stable branch as soon as possible. > > > --------------- > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.11 release. > > > There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 05:20:01 UTC 2013. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc1.gz > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > Greg, > > > > Build failed with the following error: > > > > LD ipc/built-in.o > > CC [M] fs/cifs/inode.o > > fs/cifs/inode.c: In function ‘cifs_all_info_to_fattr’: > > fs/cifs/inode.c:560:4: error: implicit declaration of function > > ‘cifs_dbg’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/inode.o] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** [fs/cifs] Error 2 > > make: *** [fs] Error 2 > > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > CC security/selinux/hooks.o > > > > I have CONFIG_CIFS=m in my config and CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG is disabled. > > cifs_dbg() is not defined. > > Ugh, I thought I fixed that one... I did it for the 3.4 and other > trees, I'll go see what I did wrong... Ok, I've now fixed this, I don't know how it got through my tests, when I tried it again, it failed. Before it wasn't, odd... Anyway, there is a new -rc2 kernel patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc2.gz If you could test that out, I would appreciate it, to ensure I didn't do anything stupid with this one too. Ick, handling 4 kernels at once really takes its toll on me, this was not a good review cycle... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html