This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/i915/kbl: KBL also needs to run the SAGV code
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-i915-kbl-kbl-also-needs-to-run-the-sagv-code.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 17777d61f4a87d7b6d5585e8fdffa83773c594e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:00:29 -0300
Subject: drm/i915/kbl: KBL also needs to run the SAGV code
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 17777d61f4a87d7b6d5585e8fdffa83773c594e7 upstream.
According to BSpec, it's the "core CPUs" that need the code, which
means SKL and KBL, but not BXT.
I don't have a KBL to test this patch on it.
v2: Only SKL should have I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED.
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474578035-424-4-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx
(cherry picked from commit 6e3100ec21e7c774a0fc01e36a1e0739530c2f71)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2881,8 +2881,14 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane
static bool
intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- return IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) &&
- dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
+ if (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv))
+ return true;
+
+ if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) &&
+ dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
}
/*
@@ -2920,7 +2926,7 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_privat
* Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular,
* don't actually have an SAGV.
*/
- if (ret == -ENXIO) {
+ if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && ret == -ENXIO) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n");
dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
return 0;
@@ -2974,7 +2980,7 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_priva
* Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular,
* don't actually have an SAGV.
*/
- if (result == -ENXIO) {
+ if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && result == -ENXIO) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n");
dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
return 0;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-fix-the-watermark-res_blocks-value.patch
queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-only-add-the-planes-actually-affected-by-ddb-changes.patch
queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-fix-the-wawmmemoryreadlatency-implementation.patch
queue-4.8/drm-i915-introduce-intel_has_sagv.patch
queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-fix-plane_blocks_per_line-on-watermarks-calculations.patch
queue-4.8/drm-i915-kbl-kbl-also-needs-to-run-the-sagv-code.patch
queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-minimum-scanlines-for-y-tile-is-not-always-4.patch
queue-4.8/drm-i915-sagv-is-not-skl-only-so-rename-a-few-things.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html